Re: Leofoto LS-364C X Version Ranger Series Tripod
EB-1 wrote:
I have the 324EX. It is the 4-section with integrated leveling bowl, starting one size down. I would not get the 5-legged tripod. It's more of a PITA to open/close and at the lower angles will be more bendy on the legs. Maybe if you don't use the lower sector, but then you still want to keep it open a little to avoid the dirt and debris field outdoors. The Leofoto legs are not so well angled for stability. I used the Dremel to remove some aluminum from the leg stops to obtain a wider, more stable stance. One or more legs continue to loosen at the spider no matter how much I tighten them. Even fully tight, they are just a little loose. I carry 4mm hex wrenches in the field.
I don't use ball heads with Leofoto and avoid the lever locks at all costs so cannot advise on that.
I absolutely do not consider my Leofoto equal to my RRS or Gitzo tripods.
EBH
Everything I've read here seems to be correct and the primary leg lock angle of 23° was the main reason why Leofoto was a deal breaker for me. The LS-364C X was on my shortlist as a travel tripod but I cannot accept such a compromise on leg angle and I don't want to have to start modifying a new purchase that was incorrectly designed in the first place.
I found the RRS Versa 34 with the optional fixed apex conversion kit + optional suregrip centre column to offer the best flexibility. It's 25° primary leg angle is acceptably stable. The only downside so far was the initial price. I've been spoiled by my Gitzo GT5543XLS which runs at 26° so anything around 23° would be a major concern.
Sep 30, 2026 at 07:32 PM
Previous versions of ULTRA777's message #17116112 « Leofoto LS-364C X Version Ranger Series Tripod »
