highdesertmesa wrote: icarus_ wrote:
I’m certainly not the target demographic for this, as I don’t really need a pro body or Leica branding. That said, if this is really _really_ just an S1Rii with Leica badging then I would love to hear from someone why it’s worth paying so much extra for that Leica name plate.
The SL3/SL3-S are already LUMIX cameras that Leica is leaning on for tech and internals. Why all of a sudden now do you want to hear about this?
Which Lumix camera is the SL3 based on? I don't know of one with similar specifications and features.
60MP and triple resolution ... matches which Lumix? Content Credentials in which Lumix?
That's not a knock on Panny, just I think folks are pretty quick to cite "rebadging" without having really done their homework. Yes, the L Alliance is in play, but that doesn't mean everything is the same. Consider a Chevy, Buick and Cadillac ... different models and some have shared components (and some not), but that doesn't mean a Cadillac is just a Chevy with a Cadillac badge ... or, is it?
Curious, if the shutter mechanism in the Lumix is the same shutter mechanism as in the Leica. We don't hear much about shutter actuation ratings these days (used to be a well publicized spec between camera models, where a mfr rated their pro gear build diff from consumer / pro-sumer) ... but, not so much these days ... I digress.
I never thought of it as simple rebadging, especially with the camera bodies. It's more like a partnership to design something to Leica's specs. Panasonic seems to be just another vendor they work with, albeit an important one.
I see it as more of a cost resource and capabilities sharing tha a vendor customer relationship.
Jun 16, 2026 at 01:01 PM
Previous versions of 1bwana1's message #17056699 « New Leica SL3-P Rumors »
