fredmiranda.com
Login
Edit history

Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS

Message #17039311 by chiron · 3 earlier versions stored · newest first

Back to the post
Current versionSaved May 15, 2026 at 03:32 PMTitle changed
Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS
Fred Miranda wrote:
schlotz wroteThe article over on DPreview does a good hob explaining the differences between the RVI and the A1-II.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0909713709/no-the-sony-a7r-vi-isn-t-a-cut-price-a1-ii
Not mentioned in the article, but I've read that the ~20ms sensor readout speed is based on 14-bit RAW. With 12-bit RAW, the readout is supposedly much faster. Is that actually true?


In my experience shooting family gatherings and children and taking cameras traveling into museums, markets, and on the street, especially at night, using electronic shutter with a camera other than an A1xx or A9xx results in unexpectedly ruined pictures from two sources: LED lights and subject distortion when a moderately moving subject is close to the lens and/or occupies a large part of the frame.

This will certainly vary for different people and shooting styles, but for me it means I have mostly given up using silent shutter on my A7CR bodies. This is a loss, but I still like the size and form factor of the A7CR enough to give up silent shutter in order to use the camera. I do wish Sony could at least make the mechanical shutter in the A7CR quieter. It is among the loudest of Sony's shutters, and that doesn't help when one is trying to shoot discreetly.

I do think there would be a real market for a camera body of modest size, with a genuinely fast stacked sensor, a good viewfinder, excellent AF and IBIS, and without a high FPS rate.

It would be a photographer's camera in the same way the Leica M series cameras are, though with a different design and technological philosophy.

It is surprising to me that there is no camera like this on the market.


Version 3Saved May 15, 2026 at 03:31 PM
Re: Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS
Fred Miranda wrote:
schlotz wroteThe article over on DPreview does a good hob explaining the differences between the RVI and the A1-II.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0909713709/no-the-sony-a7r-vi-isn-t-a-cut-price-a1-ii
Not mentioned in the article, but I've read that the ~20ms sensor readout speed is based on 14-bit RAW. With 12-bit RAW, the readout is supposedly much faster. Is that actually true?


In my experience shooting family gatherings and children and taking cameras traveling into museums, markets, and on the street, especially at night, using electronic shutter with a camera other than an A1xx or A9xx results in unexpectedly ruined pictures from two sources: LED lights and subject distortion when a moderately moving subject is close to the lens and/or occupies a large part of the frame.

This will certainly vary for different people and shooting styles, but for me it means i have mostly given up using silent shutter on my A7CR bodies. This is a loss, but I still like the size and form factor of the A7CR enough to give up silent shutter in order to use the camera. I do wish Sony could at least make the mechanical shutter in the A7CR quieter. It is among the loudest of Sony's shutters, and that doesn't help when one is trying to shoot discreetly.

I do think there would be a real market for a camera body of modest size, with a genuinely fast stacked sensor, a good viewfinder, excellent AF and IBIS, and without a high FPS rate.

It would be a photographer's camera in the same way the Leica M series cameras are, though with a different design and technological philosophy.

It is surprising to me that there is no camera like this on the market.


Version 2Saved May 15, 2026 at 03:31 PM
Re: Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS
Fred Miranda wrote:
schlotz wroteThe article over on DPreview does a good hob explaining the differences between the RVI and the A1-II.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0909713709/no-the-sony-a7r-vi-isn-t-a-cut-price-a1-ii
Not mentioned in the article, but I've read that the ~20ms sensor readout speed is based on 14-bit RAW. With 12-bit RAW, the readout is supposedly much faster. Is that actually true?


In my experience shooting family gatherings and children and taking cameras traveling into museums, markets, and on the street, especially at night, using electronic shutter with a camera other than an A1xx or A9xx results in unexpectedly ruined pictures from two sources: LED lights and subject distortion when a moderately moving subject is close to the lens and/or occupies a large part of the frame.

This will certainly vary for different people and shooting styles, but for me it means i have mostly given up using silent shutter on my A7CR bodies. This is a loss, but I still like the size and form factor of the A7CR enough to give up silent shutter in order to use the camera. I do wish Sony could at least make the mechanical shutter in the A7CR quieter. It is among the loudest of Sony's shutters, and that doesn't help when one is trying to shoot discreetly.

I do think there would be a real market for a camera body of modest size, with a genuinely fast stacked sensor, a good viewfinder, excellent AF and IBIS, and without a high FPS rate.

It would be a photographer's camera in the same way the Leica M series cameras are, though with a different design and technological philosophy.

It is surprising to me that there is no camera like this on the market.
Original postPosted May 15, 2026 at 03:28 PM
Re: Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS
Fred Miranda wrote:
schlotz wroteThe article over on DPreview does a good hob explaining the differences between the RVI and the A1-II.
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0909713709/no-the-sony-a7r-vi-isn-t-a-cut-price-a1-ii
Not mentioned in the article, but I've read that the ~20ms sensor readout speed is based on 14-bit RAW. With 12-bit RAW, the readout is supposedly much faster. Is that actually true?


In my experience shooting family gatherings and children and taking cameras traveling into museums, markets, and on the street, especially at night, using electronic shutter with a camera other than an A1xx or A9xx results in unexpectedly ruined pictures from two sources: LED lights and subject distortion when a moderately moving subject is close to the lens and/or occupies a large part of the frame.

This will certainly vary for different people and shooting styles, but for me it means i have mostly given up using silent shutter on my A7CR bodies. This is a loss, but I still like the size and form factor of the A7CR enough to give up silent shutter in order to use the camera. I do wish Sony could at least make the mechanical shutter in the A7CR quieter. It is among the loudest of Sony's shutters, and that doesn't help when one is trying to shoot discreetly.

I do think there would be a real market for a camera body of modest size, with a genuinely fast stacked sensor, a good viewfinder, excellent AF and IBIS, and without a high FPS rate.

It would be a photographer's camera in the same way the Leica M series cameras are, though with a different design and technological philosophy.

Back to the post

Switch to mobile view