The increase from 61MP to 67MP is only about a 10% increase in linear resolution, which translates to a relatively negligible real-world gain for landscape work.
The sample images at DPR show pixel size increased from 9504 to 9984 (66.5 actual mp), so only 5% linear print width. I agree this is negligible, at least in my own printing workflow. Using original pixels on my native resolution 300dpi Canon, print width went from 31.68” to 33.28”.
The increase from 61MP to 67MP is only about a 10% increase in linear resolution, which translates to a relatively negligible real-world gain for landscape work.
The sample images at DPR show pixel size increased from 9504 to 9984 (66.5 actual mp), so only 5% linear print width. I agree this is negligible, at least in my own printing workflow.
The increase from 61MP to 67MP is only about a 10% increase in linear resolution, which translates to a relatively negligible real-world gain for landscape work.
The sample images at DPR show pixel size increased from 9504 to 9984 (66.5 actual mp), so only 5% linear print width. I agree this is negligible, at least in my own printing workflow.
The increase from 61MP to 67MP is only about a 10% increase in linear resolution, which translates to a relatively negligible real-world gain for landscape work.
The sample images at DPR show resolution increased from 9504 to 9984 (66.5 actual mp), so only 5% linear print width. I agree this is negligible, at least in my own printing workflow.
May 13, 2026 at 03:26 PM
Previous versions of Ross Martin's message #17037823 « Sony A7RVI »
