None of this is surprising when you consider the design. This lens traces back to the classic double Gauss formula used in the Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux pre-ASPH, later refined in the Voigtlander 35mm f/1.4 Nokton VM. What we have here is essentially that same Voigtlander design, tweaked for the Nikon sensor stack. So this behavior is expected. If anything, I'd say this Z-mount version performs slightly better in the corners compared to the VM version.
...
I've spent a lot of time with the E-mount version over the years, and I know the M-mount version well too. The DNA here clearly traces back to the Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux pre-ASPH, one of the most iconic character lenses ever made. That lineage shows. This isn't about corner to corner perfection at f/1.4. It's about how the lens draws, how it transitions, and how it renders a scene in a way that feels intentional rather than a modern optimized look.
I don't mean to insult your baby. The APO is wonderful but suits a purpose that isn't mine. What I want is chipped Z Ultron and this gets closer. This one might be good enough.
Better or worse, most of the Noktons are clones of a particular (older or newer) Summilux and the APOs, Summicrons. Two different looks for 70 years.
Ripolini wrote: taildraggin wrote:
FS: Voigtlander 35z APO used once w/box.
I see no reason to swap an excellent lens for a compromise-lens with uncorrected aberrations people call "character" .
This 35 Nokton is smaller and faster for sure. It would be interesting to compare the VM 35/1.4 Nokton on Leica vs the 35/1.4 Z on Zf.
