AmbientMike wrote:
R7 is 15fps in mechanical shutter, which is apparently the same as Sony using the 3rd party glass people complain about Canon not having
So I don't see any slow readout speed in ES on the R7 being much trouble
You are confused about the benefits of 3rd party glass.
Most people shoot more than just action... they also shoot landscapes, travel, architecture, portraits, macro, astro, food and so on. In those cases a Sony user can throw on inexpensive third-party glass and be perfectly fine.
For sports or fast action, both the Sony and Canon shooters have to pay the price of entry, which is the 70-200/2.8GM, 100-300L, 300GM, 400GM, 600GM and so on.
AmbientMike wrote:
R7 is 15fps in mechanical shutter, which is apparently the same as Sony using the 3rd party glass people complain about Canon not having
So I don't see any slow readout speed in ES on the R7 being much trouble
You are confused about the benefits of 3rd party glass.
Most people shoot more than just action... they also shoot landscapes, travel architecture, portraits, macro, astro, food and so on. In those cases a Sony user can throw on inexpensive third-party glass and be perfectly fine.
For sports or fast action, both the Sony and Canon shooters have to pay the price of entry, which is the 70-200/2.8GM, 100-300L, 300GM, 400GM, 600GM and so on.
Dec 31, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Previous versions of aCuria's message #16958212 « Canon R7 Mk II (rumored) versus Sony A7 V »
