Re: 50mm 1.2 Sony - Sigma - Voigtlander Has anyone compared them?
I wanted to make the photo somewhat more interesting from my personal perspective, not to create any special glow.
I simply do not find anything interesting in the image produced by the Nokton lens.You like that image, good for you. Let's say these things are subjective and we have different tastes. I however reserve the right to express my opinion: there is no contest here: the image produced by the GM lens is much better and can be edited in PP to make like something one may like. The image from Nokton is blurred in an uninteresting and meaningless way.
Nifty Fifty wrote: raminolta wrote:
After a couple of minutes of PP (time mostly spent to think what outcome I like more):
GM glows
Hm, I don't see any glow, I only see a GM photo that still clearly stands out from the Nokton photo.
There's certainly a lot more that can be done if you're familiar with all the electronic tools, but like I said, it's not as easy as you think.
Perhaps you now understand why someone who likes the type of (un)sharpening rendering of a particular lens would want to take pictures with that lens and not simply with the "best" lens, only to try to correct it afterwards in Lightroom.
And don't worry, the Nokton is clearly sharper at portrait distances. :-)
Incidentally, I find it interesting that the "GERMANY" on the dial is not legible in the GM photo, but it is in the "blurry" Nokton photo.
raminolta wrote:I didn't want to make dramatic changes to the image. I would have wanted to clean the background from the clutter (keeping the coffee maker).
I'll write it a third time. This isn't about the picture, because it's not really a picture. I simply wanted a subject that effectively showcases the glow and the alarm clock was just sitting there.
Nov 30, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Previous versions of raminolta's message #16938797 « 50mm 1.2 Sony - Sigma - Voigtlander Has anyone compared them? »
