gdanmitchell wrote: RustyBug wrote: I'd say it is not a universally adopted practice for expecting PP to do all the rendering. Some folks will still prefer the natural aspect of the optic vs. pp.
Regarding: “ I'd say it is not a universally adopted practice for expecting PP to do all the rendering.” Hence threads like this one, right?
And no one suggests that “PP… do all the rendering.” Good lenses are still important, just not in the way and form that they were in the pre-digital past.
Well, as someone who utilizes very little post processing in his work I'll say the performance of a variety of lenses is still very important to me. I guess I still have a lot of the old school mindset that photography is about painting with the light, not manipulating pixels in post processing.
Well, that and I'll readily admit that I hardly now how to do anything in photoshop even with decades of using it, ! I certainly can't believe I'm the only one that still works this way. It seems to me that being an expert in post processing would just make me a sloppy photographer...maybe I'm wrong....
Of course purpose may come into play with how folks view this also. If my living was made off of it, I guess it would be a lot more vital for me to be proficient at the post process side of things. But since my photography is for me and the sheer joy of just doing it I can continue to feel and work the way I do.
Nov 16, 2025 at 02:08 PM
Previous versions of jamesdak's message #16930038 « which lens has the most 3D POP? »
! I certainly can't believe I'm the only one that still works this way. It seems to me that being an expert in post processing would just make me a sloppy photographer...maybe I'm wrong....