Also note that the CV 28 APO is full! Of ED glass elements
What I’m gathering right now is that more ED does not translate to natural 3D face profiles.
I’m seeing this with the CV 65 which has no ED compared to the CV110 that is almost entirely made of ED glass - although they both correct chromatically excellently (APO)
The portrait pictures I’m seeing from the 110 apo are not nice
I’m liking the pop from the simera 35 - it has no ED glass
Also the simera 28 has proven much better pop factor - that’s why I chose it over the CV 28 nokton.
Pop pop pop - lol
Coming to think that I prefer asphericals / high refractive index glass elements for sharpness/contrast and naturally perceivable depth over much ED to avoid CA.
