In terms of noise, pretty much the same (at the same display size, of course!) -- slight edge to the R3. That said, it looks like the R5.2 can handle a bit more NR with it's greater resolution, so that might equalize, or even reverse, the comparison. So I wouldn't choose between them on that basis. However, the R3 may focus better in low light, and that would matter more than the differences in noise, anyway.
In terms of noise, pretty much the same (at the same display size, of course!) -- slight edge to the R3. That said, it looks like the R5.2 can handle a bit more NR with it's greater resolution, so that might equalize, or even reverse, the comparison. So I wouldn't choose between them on that basis. However, the R3 may focus better in low light, and that would matter more than the differences in noise, anyway.
In terms of noise, pretty much the same (at the same display size, of course!). So I wouldn't choose between them on that basis. However, the R3 may focus better in low light, and that would matter more than the differences in noise, anyway.
Nov 09, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Previous versions of takowasa's message #16925765 « ?: Canon EOS R5 vs. EOS R3 low light and high ISO comparison »
