fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
aCuria
's message
#16916626
« A9III Buffer Performing Better Than Earlier Tests, What’s Going On? »
aCuria
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
A9III Buffer Performing Better Than Earlier Tests... What’s Going On?
I refer to this post:
dclark wrote
:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1856860/0
For some reason when I tried to replicate the experiment I got completely different results!
120fps,_30fps,_60fps
by
acurian
, on Flickr
* Sony's 160GB CF-A card.
* Compressed RAW
* AF OFF
60fps_Lossless_Comp_(L)_+_JPEG_Fine_24M
by
acurian
, on Flickr
This is lossless compressed + jpeg, the data is more messy because AF is on.
120fps_compressed
by
acurian
, on Flickr
This is compressed raw 120fps with autofocus on
Either way I do not slow down to 5fps as per dclark's testing?
Could it be just the different memory card?
Oct 29, 2025 at 08:52 PM
aCuria
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Sony A9III Buffer Behavior
I refer to this post:
dclark wrote
:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1856860/0
For some reason when I tried to replicate the experiment I got completely different results!
120fps,_30fps,_60fps
by
acurian
, on Flickr
* Sony's 160GB CF-A card.
* Compressed RAW
* AF OFF
60fps_Lossless_Comp_(L)_+_JPEG_Fine_24M
by
acurian
, on Flickr
This is lossless compressed + jpeg, the data is more messy because AF is on.
120fps_compressed
by
acurian
, on Flickr
This is compressed raw 120fps with autofocus on
Either way I do not slow down to 5fps as per dclark's testing?
Could it be just the different memory card?
Oct 27, 2025 at 01:03 PM
aCuria
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Sony A9III Buffer Behavior
I refer to this post:
dclark wrote
:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1856860/0
For some reason when I tried to replicate the experiment I got completely different results!
120fps,_30fps,_60fps
by
acurian
, on Flickr
* Sony's 160GB CF-A card.
* Compressed RAW
* AF OFF
60fps_Lossless_Comp_(L)_+_JPEG_Fine_24M
by
acurian
, on Flickr
This is lossless compressed + jpeg, the data is more messy because AF is on.
Either way I do not slow down to 5fps as per dclark's testing?
Could it be just the different memory card?
Oct 27, 2025 at 12:00 PM
Previous versions of
aCuria
's message
#16916626
« A9III Buffer Performing Better Than Earlier Tests, What’s Going On? »