EB-1 wrote:
I prefer tests and reviews of the product gainst a fixed standard, not against another random product.
EBH
And what is your fixed standard?
(BTW the Lumix is not random - it's the one mirrorless/hybrid with raw video DR rivaling the Red Raptor.)
Those imatests seem to be a joke - two cameras can have the same imatest score, but then doing a deep dive one of the cameras can recover three times more in the shadows without falling apart than the other.
Example: R5II and Sony A1 - seem to have imatested the same, but the actual results are radically different. The Sony wins hands down. R5II is a real mess in the shadows.
I have owned both of the above (sold the Canon), and Cined.com proves this discrepancy out in their latitude tests of these two cameras.
EB-1 wrote:
I prefer tests and reviews of the product gainst a fixed standard, not against another random product.
EBH
And what is your fixed standard?
(and that Lumix is not random - it's the one mirrorless/hybrid with raw video DR rivaling the Red Raptor.)
Those imatests seem to be a joke - two cameras can have the same imatest score, but then doing a deep dive one of the cameras can recover three times more in the shadows without falling apart than the other.
Example: R5II and Sony A1 - seem to have imatested the same, but the actual results are radically different. The Sony wins hands down. R5II is a real mess in the shadows.
I have owned both of the above (sold the Canon), and Cined.com proves this out in their latitude tests of these two cameras.
Oct 13, 2025 at 07:07 PM
Previous versions of ronno's message #16907959 « Zr - the review I was waiting for »
