Steve Spencer wrote: aCuria wrote: Immortal wrote: wind30 wrote:
I think the dr difference between the z8 and A7r5 is insignificant. I own both. Who said there was a difference? The Nikon with bad dr is z6iii
Z8 and Z6 III are almost matched in DR till ISO 400, after that till roughly 700-750 Z8 is ahead and again, from ISO 800 and up they're matched. The real benefit of Z8 is that you can shoot at ISO 64 with higher DR than Z6 III at its base ISO of 100.
That's not saying much when they are both worse than the D750, a 11 year old camera.
The Z8 and Z9 are only worse than the D750 below ISO 500, an ISO range that you yourself have characterized as not the range for which these cameras are typically shot given the genres for which they are used.
I am not much of a wildlife photographer either but these are below 500 7IV01757 by acurian, on Flickr
