It's really weird. It seems like some people here are trying to argue really hard that A7 IV is a better camera than Z6 III.
Don't take me wrong way - A7 IV was and is a very good camera but unless you really need 33 Mpix its simply worse than Z6 III or even Z5 II now. The DR difference is meaningless in real world aplications and been that way for years unless you shoot very specific things and even than you will be hard pressed to notice any difference without pixel-peeping. It's just "neerding" for the sake of it.
Also arguing that silent shooting on Z6 III is not viable is simply just wrong. There are many situations/places where you will preffer silent shooting and with Z6 III you absolutely can. You will see most likely no rolling shutter in stills in like 99% of your shoots coz 1/69s sensor readout speed is more than enough for most things except a really fast sport.
It's really weird. It seems like some people here are trying to argue really hard that A7 IV is a better camera than Z6 III.
Don't take me wrong A7 IV was and is a very good camera but unless you really need 33 Mpix its simply worse than Z6 III or even Z5 II now. The DR difference is meaningless in real world aplications and been that way for years unless you shoot very specific things and even than you will be hard pressed to notice any difference without pixel-peeping. It's just "neerding" for the sake of it.
Also arguing that silent shooting on Z6 III is not viable is simply just wrong. There are many situations/places where you will preffer silent shooting and with Z6 III you absolutely can. You will see most likely no rolling shutter in stills in like 99% of your shoots coz 1/69s sensor readout speed is more than enough for most things except a really fast sport.
It's really weird. It seems like some people here are trying to argue really hard that A7 IV is a better camera than Z6 III.
Don't take me wrong A7 IV was and is a very good camera but unless you really need 33 Mpix its simply worse than Z6 III or even Z5 II now. The DR difference is meaningless in real world aplications and been that way for years unless you shoot very specific things and even than you will be hard pressed to notice any difference without pixel-peeping. It's just "neerding" for the sake of it.
Also arguing that silent shooting on Z6 III is not viable is simply just wrong. There are many situations/places where you will preffer silent shooting and with Z6 III you absolutely can. You will see most likely no rolling shutter in stills in like 99% of your shoots coz 1/69s is more than enough for most things except a really fast sport.
It's really weird. It seems like some people here are trying to argue really hard that A7 IV is a better camera than Z6 III.
Don't take me wrong A7 IV was and is a very good camera but unless you really need 33 Mpix its simply worse than Z6 III or even Z5 II now. The DR difference is meaningless in real world aplications and been that way for years unless you shoot in very specific things and even than you will be hard pressed to notice any difference without pixel-peeping. It's just "neerding" for the sake of it.
Also arguing that silent shooting on Z6 III is not viable is simply just wrong. There are many situations/places where you will preffer silent shooting and with Z6 III you absolutely can. You will see most likely no rolling shutter in stills in like 99% of your shoots coz 1/69s is more than enough for most things except really fast sport.
Sep 23, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Previous versions of Immortal's message #16895700 « After 13 years of all Sony, I'm trying Nikon »
