fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
bernardl
's message
#16891323
« Why is the Nikon 35 1.2s and 50 1.2s so large compared to others? »
bernardl
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Why is the Nikon 35 1.2s and 50 1.2s so large compared to others?
RoamingScott wrote
:
bernardl wrote
:The Z6/Z7 were best in class in most aspects
This is some WILD revisionist history, even for you
Why the need for partial quotation? Just pick the whole sentence if you are interested in an actual discussion of the matter.
Cheers,
Bernard
Sep 15, 2025 at 08:08 PM
bernardl
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Why is the Nikon 35 1.2s and 50 1.2s so large compared to others?
RoamingScott wrote
:
bernardl wrote
:The Z6/Z7 were best in class in most aspects
This is some WILD revisionist history, even for you
Why the need for partial quotation?
Cheers,
Bernard
Sep 15, 2025 at 08:04 PM
Previous versions of
bernardl
's message
#16891323
« Why is the Nikon 35 1.2s and 50 1.2s so large compared to others? »