Re: How sharp / less sharp should a G lens be compared to a GM?
TheEyesHaveIt wrote: RoamingScott wrote:
The amount of people that cheerlead the 20-70 here as if it's one of the sharpest zooms ever made has been a little goofy, though...glad to see some reality for once with this lens.
---------------------------------------------
BigBabyMoses06 wrote:
That image quality seems a bit, rough to me on the 20-70. I was in the market for one and now need to re-evaluate my options.
Yeah I'm a little concerned and maybe should send this back. I had bought it as a travel lens for a trip in a couple of weeks, but at 100% I would've expected sharper. I'll compare it to my Tamron 17-28 and decide if I need to take that + the GM and lose out on the range. I also bought a Sony 16mm 1.8 - that one is a bit harder to compare against, but I'll compare it to the Tamron.
It's known that zooms are almost always less sharper than primes, but, would you rather capture more moments during your vacation or would you rather pixel-peep?
Sep 08, 2025 at 02:17 PM
Previous versions of nepali's message #16886698 « How sharp / less sharp should a G lens be compared to a GM? »
