While these are present in even non converted pictures, in IR where sky goes dark, these are more readily visible. At 590mm still let's in a bit if blue light. Use a 720nm+ filter and you will see more of these.
kwilliam8 wrote: indusphoto wrote:
With Z7 you will get horizontal bags in dark areas pretty easily. I have not tested Z7 ii but it is supposed to be better.
When you are in infrared zone, you lose details anyway (because all light except ir is blocked). For that reason I think Z6 and Z6II are better choices.
What are "horizontal bags"? I have a Z7 IR converted to 590nm by LifePixel, and have been happy with it.
While these are present even non converted pictures, in IR where sky goes dark, these are more readily visible. At 590mm still let's in a bit if blue light. Use a 720nm+ filter and you will see more of these.
kwilliam8 wrote: indusphoto wrote:
With Z7 you will get horizontal bags in dark areas pretty easily. I have not tested Z7 ii but it is supposed to be better.
When you are in infrared zone, you lose details anyway (because all light except ir is blocked). For that reason I think Z6 and Z6II are better choices.
What are "horizontal bags"? I have a Z7 IR converted to 590nm by LifePixel, and have been happy with it.
Aug 24, 2025 at 09:30 PM
Previous versions of indusphoto's message #16876906 « Z7 or 7II for InfraRed conversion? »
