I just think it's a missed opportunity by Canon. As smart phone cameras have gotten so good, I find myself struggling to justify taking my R10 with multiple lenses vacation. A small, light 15-150mm lens would really fit the bill. Even a 15-85mm would be great. I just don't understand why 3 extra mm would add so much to the cost.
My current intermediate compromise is my G5X Mark II, which has a 24-120mm F1.8-2.8 lens. It's an amazing little camera, but it's like 6 years old and lacks the great AF or the R10.
Aug 14, 2025 at 09:29 AM
Previous versions of Kmccarthy's message #16870135 « Why do crop lenses usually start at 18mm? »
