Re: Kinda feeling like r5 mark ii won't get 4k 60p oversampled mode. Anyone else think so too?
ronno wrote:
Yes it’s lame.
I also have a Sony A1 and it’s 4k60 (while also not oversampled) is vastly sharper and more detailed than my R52.
Canon really should step up here and do something about this. On top of this the Sony has a significant DR advantage for video.
Soft fuzzy 4k60 on a $4K camera?! I would consider keeping just the Canons if this were improved. Instead I’m likely to sell the Canon soon.
I have the R5ii and owned the A1 and A7RV. While I admit that I mostly shoot raw, respectfully, I think you are mistaken that the sony has better dynamic range. That may have been the case with the original R5. Even then, the difference was probably just under a stop. With the addition of clog 2, Sony doesn't have a dynamic range advantage that you will notice in the real world. If memory serves me right, the R5ii 4k 120 is better than that of the A1
Re: Kinda feeling like r5 mark ii won't get 4k 60p oversampled mode. Anyone else think so too?
ronno wrote:
Yes it’s lame.
I also have a Sony A1 and it’s 4k60 (while also not oversampled) is vastly sharper and more detailed than my R52.
Canon really should step up here and do something about this. On top of this the Sony has a significant DR advantage for video.
Soft fuzzy 4k60 on a $4K camera?! I would consider keeping just the Canons if this were improved. Instead I’m likely to sell the Canon soon.
I have the R5ii and owned the A1 and A7RV. While I admit that I mostly shoot raw, respectfully, I think you are mistaken that the sony has better dynamic range. That may have been the case with the original R5. Even then, the difference was probably just under a stop. With the addition of clog 2, Sony doesn't have a dynamic range advantage that you will notice in the real world.
Aug 12, 2025 at 07:51 AM
Previous versions of Howie4life's message #16868882 « Kinda feeling like r5 mark ii won't get 4k 60p oversampled mode. Anyone else think so too? »
