Re: Sony RX1R MkIII: A beautiful camera with a second to none lens
I am not against it and I am not personally intrigued by it either. I do like small and light cameras but I care about some features which are missing in this particular camera. So it's not for me. If i had the budget, I would more likely opt for A7c r (or A7c ii) plus some good quality compact lenses. However, I see some people may really want it for their own reasons. It could be for the size and weight. It does fit into many pockets where almost no other FF camera would fit. Some women may like it because it fits into their purse. For one who wants to carries a camera with him/her all the time, the minimal weight can make it real possible.
Re: Sony RX1R MkIII: A beautiful camera with a second to none lens
I am not against it though I am not personally intrigued by it either. I do like small and light cameras but I care about some features which are missing in this particular camera. So it's not for me. If i had the budget, I would more likely opt for A7c r (or A7c ii) plus some good quality compact lenses. However, I see some people may really want it for their own reasons. It could be for the size and weight. It does fit into many pockets where almost no other FF camera would fit. Some women may like it because it fits into their purse. For one who wants to carries a camera with him/her all the time, the minimal weight can make it real possible.
Jul 28, 2025 at 09:33 AM
Previous versions of raminolta's message #16859853 « Sony RX1R MkIII: A beautiful camera with a second to none lens »
