I just went through your scenario too after shedding the GFX 100S II, except with the 907X/100C. It is mainly used for landscape.
I started with the 38V for a long time, the recently acquired the 25V. I just like the MF clutch on the V lens series so decided to stick with those where possible. You get what you pay for. Then I got the 135/2.8. What a lens and when combined with the 1.7x gives you so much versatility.
Just recently I got both the 55V and 90V because I decided too stick with the Hasselblad system and might acquire the X3D or whatever it will be called.
Here has been my take since I want full field of view coverage-25V=95˚;38V=70˚;55V=53˚;90V=34˚; 135=23˚; AND 135+1.7x=14˚. With the Hasselblad lineup the spread is very uniform at around 20˚.
My 2 cents.
I just went through your scenario too after shedding the GFX 100S II, except with the 907X/100C. It is mainly used for landscape.
I started with the 38V for a long time, the recently acquired the 25V. I just like the MF clutch on the V lens series so decided to stick with those where possible. You get what you pay for. Then I got the 135/2.8. What a lens and when combined with the 1.7x gives you so much versatility.
Just recently I got both the 55V and 90V because I decided too stick with the Hasselblad system and might acquired the X3D or whatever it will be called.
Here has been my take since I want full field of view coverage-25V=95˚;38V=70˚;55V=53˚;90V=34˚; 135=23˚; AND 135+1.7x=14˚. With the Hasselblad lineup the spread is very uniform at around 20˚.
My 2 cents.
