This new Mavic 4 Pro is generating a lot of enthusiasm, and I think for some good reasons. The claims made in the linked review are not always well supported. As noted above, the resolution test is not well documented so it's hard to know what is being presented, but given the large pixel count it is likely that the resolution will be excellent. It is also unlikely that the resolution tests were taken while the camera was in-flight and being stabilized by the gimbal.
The statement that I found incredible is "Amazingly, the drone manages to more-a-less equal the low noise levels from the mighty medium-format 100MP Fujifilm GFX100RF!". By incredible I mean lacking credibility. NFW. Statements like that cause me to take everything else as being suspect.
Regardless, I am eager to get this new drone. Unfortunately it is not available in the US and when it is finally available, the price may be more stunning that the photos and videos.
Jun 24, 2025 at 11:02 AM
Previous versions of dclark's message #16839277 « Mavic 4 Pro drone outresolves Sony A7RV! »
