robsonj wrote:
And there are many who complain about the no ibis on the m11 leading to shaky photos. Personally I’ve never had an issue, I think sometimes it just comes to knowing the limitations and working within them
newyork wrote:
Like many others here this camera has interested me. For some reason the x100 never really did.
Currently I shoot an m10 and zf and consider the zf my main camera.
I’d have to rid myself of the m10 to acquire anything whether it’s the RF, a Z8, Q3 or a gfx100s. I’m not a professional. Wish I was. I get paid for a couple things that require a zoom lens on my zf.
The gfxRF is intriguing but f/4 with no way to go faster is a hmmmm to me. My m10 has no ibis but it’s not 102mp. If it had ibis and 2.8 lens it’d be sooooo tempting
I’ve never had an issue either - but I have the option of using a fast lens when I need it. In many ways, the M11 has provided the most enjoyable photographic experiences I’ve had. There’s no doubt the RF can perform incredibly, it’s just a bit more limited - or differently limited than an M. I think that’s fine, it’s just disappointing to people who wanted something more versatile like an X100, Q, or even the GFX100S. It’s really more akin to the M in that way- powerful tool if it does what you need, and definitely not for every use or everyone.
Mar 30, 2025 at 07:03 PM
Previous versions of itai195's message #16784520 « Fujifilm GFX100RF Discussion and Image Thread »
