DWOfPaul wrote: [...]Personally, I am more interested in seeing a mirrorless version of the ZF2 line. High quality lenses that are more reasonable in size, weight, and price.
chez wrote: The Batis line fits that need.
Jonas B wrote: For me the 40mm Batis could have been interesting. Weight? OK. Price? No. Size? No. That's one out of tree.
But, wht, let's see what happens. I'll keep breathing though.
chez wrote: I suppose everyone is different when it comes to weight, size and price…but like anything else, if you want light, small and great…you won’t get cheap.
Hey, if adding "greatness" we can also add ergonomics and then we have:
Weight? OK.
Price? No.
Size? No.
Great optically? Yes.
Ergonomics: No.
Two out of five. That can be OK for many but I certainly want better for a prime I carry and use all day.
You should not judge others based on yourself.
What does that mean, really? I wrote that I'm not happy with two out of five while it may be OK for other people. That's about me. Or do you mean I judge other peoples opinion on the different features of the Batis 40mm?
Which parameter(s) do we disagree about?
Feb 15, 2025 at 02:21 PM
Previous versions of Jonas B's message #16754079 « ZEISS Otus ML line officially announced! »
