fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
1bwana1
's message
#16717322
« Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse? »
1bwana1
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
On
Re: Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse?
arbitrage wrote
:
groob wrote
:
a 300 mm f/2.8, which, again, is all but unusable without TCs.
here, hold my beer....
The perfect response to untrue declarative statements so prevelent on this particular board.
Talent, not gear...
Dec 29, 2024 at 11:36 AM
Previous versions of
1bwana1
's message
#16717322
« Is Nikon AF (Z9/8) really that much worse? »