RoamingScott wrote:
Thypoch 28 is a bit of an odd rec if you value IQ since it's one of the worse Thypochs when mounted to Z due to sensor thickness differences. All they did was take the M design and slap a Z mount on it without accounting for the sensor.
I also have a hard time with them giving M glass contacts but not Z. Hoping they have a Mark II line that fixes both of these things.
are you speaking from personal experience? you own one and have personally tested it out right?
RoamingScott wrote:
Thypoch 28 is a bit of an odd rec if you value IQ since it's one of the worse Thypochs when mounted to Z due to sensor thickness differences. All they did was take the M design and slap a Z mount on it without accounting for the sensor.
I also have a hard time with them giving M glass contacts but not Z. Hoping they have a Mark II line that fixes both of these things.
are you speaking from personal experience? you own one and have personally tested it out right?
RoamingScott wrote:
Thypoch 28 is a bit of an odd rec if you value IQ since it's one of the worse Thypochs when mounted to Z due to sensor thickness differences. All they did was take the M design and slap a Z mount on it without accounting for the sensor.
I also have a hard time with them giving M glass contacts but not Z. Hoping they have a Mark II line that fixes both of these things.
are you speaking from personal experience? you own one and have personally tested it out right?
recent shots from my thypoch 28 and zf
Dec 15, 2024 at 04:44 PM
Previous versions of luminorsubm's message #16707801 « Let's talk about the Nikon Zf »