RoamingScott wrote: Knut. wrote:And, do your own research: the closer an object gets, the greater the advantage of 5 axis IBIS versus 3 axis IBIS. Olympus has pioneered this and helpful insights into the differences between 3/5 axis IBIS can often be found in micro 4/3 forums.
To some extend it boils down to which distances a photographer typically shoots. A landscape photographer might profit less than a fan of flower close-ups or even macro photography.
Not all of us are shooting our cat's buttholes at MFD where this is a pressing concern
….
Well, not all close ups are about buttholes. I feel that there are use cases where 5 axis IBIS is clearly of an advantage and blnmen57 pointed out that 5 axis IBIS is possible with VC lenses on Sony bodies. This is clearly relevant, especially considering that Voigtländer not only produces the 40, but also the 65 and 110mm macros.
I agree that the effect of 5 axis IBIS over 3 axis IBIS is neglible on Voigtländer‘s 10, 12, 15 and most likely 21mm lenses.
RoamingScott wrote: Knut. wrote:And, do your own research: the closer an object gets, the greater the advantage of 5 axis IBIS versus 3 axis IBIS. Olympus has pioneered this and helpful insights into the differences between 3/5 axis IBIS can often be found in micro 4/3 forums.
To some extend it boils down to which distances a photographer typically shoots. A landscape photographer might profit less than a fan of flower close-ups or even macro photography.
Not all of us are shooting our cat's buttholes at MFD where this is a pressing concern
….
Well, not all close ups are about buttholes. I feel that there are use cases where 5 axis IBIS is clearly of an advantage and blnmen57, pointing out that 5 axis IBIS is possible with VC lenses on Sony bodies, is clearly relevant, especially considering that Voigtländer not only produces the 40, but also the 65 and 110mm macros.
I agree that the effect of 5 axis IBIS over 3 axis IBIS is neglible on Voigtländer‘s 10, 12, 15 and most likely 21mm lenses.
