nomadthirty wrote:
Do people here think the mark 2 will produce shots that feel more "clinical" than the mark 1? From what I've read online that was a complaint that many photographers had with the 33mm f/1.4 vs the 35mm f/1.4, that the older models had more 'character'.
The XF 35mm f1.4 has bokeh with some character - a bit of swirl and looks interesting as opposed to nauseating when tending towards nervousness. This is the type of character often seen in older lens designs. It is my favourite Fuji lens.
I don't think the 16-50 was ever regarded in this way.
Nov 21, 2024 at 11:41 PM
Previous versions of Geoff D F's message #16690940 « A smaller XF16-55 II? »
