molson wrote: ingekj wrote: molson wrote: ingekj wrote:
Only Canon have the nerve to reuse the DSLR versions of their 600 F4 and 400 F2.8, weld a 2xTC and an adapter on there and charge 20k for it, and if you look at the optical diagram that is exactly what they did.
Big deal... Canon recycles lens parts, Sony recycles sensors, and Nikon recycles recall notices. Who cares?
Lol you hop from one system to the next like youre changing socks. What brand will you be fanboying for next month?
I don't "fanboy any brand" - I choose what tools work best for the application at hand. I happen to have had a Canon Canada CPS membership since 1999, but I'm also a Sony PRO Services member, Nikon Canada NPS member, and Panasonic Pro Services member. I don't belong to Fuji's pro service because it's too expensive for what it offers, and Fuji Canada automatically provides Pro service to GFX system owners anyway.
That means that unlike you and most of the other trolls here, I've actually owned and used the gear I'm talking about. I know that probably seems very strange to people like you, who have apparently learned everything there is to know about equipment by watching sponsored YouTube reviews by your favourite brand ambassadors, or following the hilarious DP Review posts by the pseudo-intellectuals who have never even owned a camera.
Yet you declined to answer all the questions I asked you about your usage of these cameras, the reason for the continued usage of Sony as well as your selection of genre in bird photography (basically only static shots), the reason why you don’t use primes although you always seem to be using your zooms at their longest focal length, why you only posted images shot with Nikon equipment captured during a super short period (one month, only one image with the Z8) and still claim to know the system in and out?
These would help sustain your self positioning as an absolute expert on this topic.
