bballfreak6 wrote:
Read only the first and last few pages for sh!ts and gigs..
Which probably explains why your comment has little to do with my main point.
I can’t insist that you read all those words, but it probably would take no more time to read the post than it took to write your comment on the post you did not read.
bernardl wrote:
If I were you I would go Fuji GFX.
It is obviously on my list of options. One issue is that I like to use long lenses and strongly prefer zooms for my landscape work. For example, I make a lot of use of the Canon EF 100-400mm v.2 There are ways around Fujifilm’s i lack of such lenses but they are a negative on the system. (Yes, I know about removing the rear baffle of the 100-400 and using adapters.)
If Fujifilm made a 200-400 (or better yet a 200-500) I would be all over it.
(And even with that, I’d still need something else for my bird photography. I have some ideas about how to work around that.)
bernardl wrote:
I believe you are making an unsupported assertion here. It is my understanding that ALL digital cameras apply some kinds of NR to the image data captured in the raw file. It is hard to get concrete information about this since camera companies prefer not to discuss it.
bballfreak6 wrote:
Read only the first and last few pages for sh!ts and gigs..
Which probably explains why your comment has little to do with my main point.
I can’t insist that you read all those words, but it probably would take no more time to read the post than it took to write your comment on the post you did not read.
bernardl wrote:
If I were you I would go Fuji GFX.
It is obviously on my list of options. One issue is that I like to use long lenses and strongly prefer zooms for my landscape work. For example, I make a lot of use of the Canon EF 100-400mm v.2 There are ways around Fujifilm’s i lack of such lenses but they are a negative on the system. (Yes, I know about removing the rear baffle of the 100-400 and using adapters.)
If Fujifilm made a 200-400 (or better yet a 200-500) I would be all over it.
(And even with that, I’d still need something else for my bird photography. I have some ideas about how to work around that.)
bernardl wrote:
I believe you are incorrect about this. It is my understanding that ALL digital cameras apply some kinds of NR to the image data captured in the raw file. It is hard to get concrete information about this since camera companies prefer not to discuss it.
