cbass wrote: Danpbphoto wrote:
He has renounced the worldly life and for that he can be thankful!
Great Charles!
Dan
Perhaps not the place to discuss this, but I feel that's a bit heavy handed. Worldly life is filled with both good and evil and in my mind the goal is to renounce the evil and keep the good of life. Renouncing it completely to me is like killing the patient along with the cancer.
Actually if you read the definition of Charles' subject, sandhu, that is exactlty what he is defined as. Not sayin it is right or wrong. If the "worldly life is as you state, good v evil, then he has "disowned" himself from that conflict. The fact that this person dedicates his life to that religious philosophy has earned my respect.
cbass wrote: Danpbphoto wrote:
He has renounced the worldly life and for that he can be thankful!
Great Charles!
Dan
Perhaps not the place to discuss this, but I feel that's a bit heavy handed. Worldly life is filled with both good and evil and in my mind the goal is to renounce the evil and keep the good of life. Renouncing it completely to me is like killing the patient along with the cancer.
Actually if you read the definition of Charles' subject that is exactlty what he is defined as. Not sayin it is right or wrong. The fact that this person dedicates his life to that religious philosophy has earned my respect.
Jun 25, 2024 at 03:14 PM
Previous versions of Danpbphoto's message #16580125 « An Old Sadhu »
