I personally think that Canon did this one right to add a higher quality 35mm prime, but kept it f/1.4 to keep it lightweight, smallish and priced under $1,500. Well done. They will sell a lot of more this lens than they would of a $2,800 f/1.2 lenses.
Again, Canon's marketing department should be firedfor touting this as a "hybrid-lens". Everything is hybrid these days, that train left the station a long time ago. What's next? A vlogging camera 8 years too late?
Let's hope they bring out a great f/1.4 glass for 24mm, 28mm and 50mm as well - much like Sony has done. Dare we dream about a RF 40/1.4? :-)
I personally think that Canon did this one right to add a higher quality 35mm prime, but kept it f/1.4 to keep it lightweight, smallish and priced under $1,500. Well done. They will sell a lot of more this lens than they would of a $2,800 f/1.2 lenses.
Again, Canon's marketing department should be <strike>fired</strike> for touting this as a "hybrid-lens". Everything is hybrid these days, that train left the station a long time ago. What's next? A vlogging camera 8 years too late?
Let's hope they bring out a great f/1.4 glass for 24mm, 28mm and 50mm as well - much like Sony has done. Dare we dream about a RF 40/1.4? :-)
I personally think that Canon did this one right to add a higher quality 35mm prime, but kept it f/1.4 to keep it lightweight, smallish and priced under $1,500. Well done. They will sell a lot of more this lens than they would of a $2,800 f/1.2 lenses.
Again, Canon's marketing department should be fired for touting this as a "hybrid-lens". Everything is hybrid these days, that train left the station a long time ago. What's next? A vlogging camera 8 years too late?
Let's hope they bring out a great f/1.4 glass for 24mm, 28mm and 50mm as well - much like Sony has done. Dare we dream about a RF 40/1.4? :-)
I personally think that Canon did this one right to add a higher quality 35mm prime, but kept it f/1.4 to keep it lightweight, smallish and priced under $1,500. Well done. They will sell a lot of more this lens than they would of a $2,800 f/1.2 lenses.
Again, Canon's marketing department should be fired for touting this as a "hybrid-lens". Everything is hybrid these days, that train left the station a long time ago. What's next? A vlogging camera 8 years too late?
Let's hope they bring out a great f/1.4 glass for 24mm, 28mm and 50mm as well - much like Sony has done. Dare we dream about a RF 40/1.4? :-)
I personally think that Canon did this one right to add a higher quality 35mm prime, but kept it f/1.4 to keep it lightweight, smallish and priced under $1,500. Well done. They will sell a lot of more this lens than they would of a $2,800 f/1.2 lenses.
Again, Canon's marketing department should be fired for touting this as a "hybrid-lens". Everything is hybrid these days, that train left the station a long time ago. What's next? A vlogging camera 8 years too late?
Let's hope they bring out a great f/1.4 glass for 24mm, 28mm and 50mm as well - much like Sony has done. Dare we dream about a RF 40/1.4? :-)
