Re: Ai and Photoshop's Generative Fill (a discussion please)
Yeah, ummm...neither of the two people above actually work in the higher end photography field, so I would not place too much stock in what they are saying.
What AI is going to do to a lot of digital photography is make it worthless unless a couple of factors are met. One is that the person is already very well established and has a stellar reputation for showing real works. Two is that the type of work they do have clients who will never-ever take the risk of buying and therefore using AI to "spice up" images.
My three biggest client types want my work for what I delver in reality, in camera, in the real world. One example is the 5 figure commission for an aerial panoramic I am to do this week while there is still snow up high.
But the the galleries I work with, they simply do not want the AI garbage, at all and neither do the high net worth individuals who live in my town or the interior designers and architects who buy fine art for projects.
So once again, in addition to several strategies in that I simply do not have to settle for the "Adapt or Die" messaging by the hobby types on here, I am also very well positioned to improve my revenue stream by making real fine art prints in a real darkroom that command real money from real people.
Jun 05, 2024 at 03:56 PM
Previous versions of Ai_Print's message #16565006 « Ai and Photoshop's Generative Fill (a discussion please) »
