jlafferty wrote:
If only this website had a Sony forum where you guys could navel gaze and fawn over Sony in reply to every topic, without all the Nikon discussions getting in the way…
thedruid wrote:
I had the Sony A7iv and it has 33MP, no issues with it used it along with a 20-70mm and 70-200mm f4, great combo, which Nikon does not have. I've used all the major brands at one stage or another, I like to do my own testing and reviews. They all produced similar images, ergo became more important to me in the end.
If only the Nikon people could discuss Nikon products without comparing them to other brands. As is usual on the Nikon Forums it is the Nikon people who turn the conversation towards other brands.
In this thread it was our friend bernardl who is a frequent practitioner of the art.
Isn’t there a difference btwn comparing a Nikon cameras to its natural competitors vs commenting in depth about a non Nikon camera?
Cheers,
Bernard
Personally I think it is all good. I was just pointing the fact out to those complaining about it.
A more positive, and likely more meaningful, comparison would be against the existing Nikon Z6II so that it would be clear what one is getting and if they think it is a worthwhile equipment expense.
jlafferty wrote:
If only this website had a Sony forum where you guys could navel gaze and fawn over Sony in reply to every topic, without all the Nikon discussions getting in the way…
thedruid wrote:
I had the Sony A7iv and it has 33MP, no issues with it used it along with a 20-70mm and 70-200mm f4, great combo, which Nikon does not have. I've used all the major brands at one stage or another, I like to do my own testing and reviews. They all produced similar images, ergo became more important to me in the end.
If only the Nikon people could discuss Nikon products without comparing them to other brands. As is usual on the Nikon Forums it is the Nikon people who turn the conversation towards other brands.
In this thread it was our friend bernardl who is a frequent practitioner of the art.
