Re: Leica 50/1.4 Lux vs Voigtlander 50/1.2 Nokton vs 50/2 APO
My vote would be for the m11 and buy a voigtlander 50mm apo. I haven’t used the 50mm f1.2 but I’ve used the 1.0 Nokton recently and 50mm summilux asph latest version. I think what sets the summilux apart is really great colors, sharpness and bokeh that comes together well. It’s also a small package. The voigtlander m-mount apos in my opinion are very close in rendering in a similar size. F2 vs 1.4 isn’t a deal breaker imo.
I think going from a m11 to a m240 would be a massive step up and worth prioritizing over the Leica lens. As for m10-r vs m11, I haven’t used the 10-r but I have a solid m11 without issues and i don’t think I would ever want to go with the 10-r. Real world dynamic range is very good and all the benchmarks show it’s better than the 10-r. I think it got a bad rap due to early batch QC issues so make sure you buy a later used or new model with warranty.
Re: Leica 50/1.4 Lux vs Voigtlander 50/1.2 Nokton vs 50/2 APO
My vote would be for the m11 and buy a voigtlander 50mm apo. I haven’t used the 50mm f1.2 but I’ve used the 1.0 Nokton recently and 50mm summilux asph latest version. I think what sets the summilux apart is really great colors, sharpness and bokeh that comes together well. It’s also a small package. The voigtlander m-mount apos in my opinion are very close in rendering in a similar size. F2 vs 1.4 isn’t a deal breaker imo.
As for m10-r vs m11, I haven’t used the 10-r but I have a solid m11 without issues and i don’t think I would ever want to go with the 10-r. Real world dynamic range is very good and all the benchmarks show it’s better than the 10-r. I think it got a bad rap due to early batch QC issues so make sure you buy a later used or new model with warranty.
Apr 03, 2024 at 03:54 PM
Previous versions of tzhang4284's message #16515198 « Leica 50/1.4 Lux vs Voigtlander 50/1.2 Nokton vs 50/2 APO »
