It would be worth it to me, but I don't think you'll notice much difference in image quality. The biggie for me is the R6 Mk II has R3/R7 AF style where you have tracking available in all AF patterns: spot, single, expanded, small area, etc. I greatly prefer the newer arrangement over the old R/R5/R6 dedicated whole screen tracking mode and having faith the camera will recognize my subject and track. The R6 MK II also has the newer hot shoe and can be used with the latest flash, controllers, audio, etc. Canon appears to have fixed the problems with the loose shoe, improved battery life and cooling.
It would be worth it to me, but I don't think you'll notice much difference in image quality. The biggie for me is the R6 Mk II has R3/R7 AF style where you have tracking available in all AF patterns: spot, single, expanded, small area, etc. I greatly prefer the newer arrangement over the old R/R5/R6 dedicated whole screen tracking mode and having faith the camera will recognize my subject and track. The R6 MK II also has the newer hot shoe and can be used with the latest flash, controllers, audio, etc. Canon appears to have fixed the problems with the loose shoe as well.
Apr 01, 2024 at 12:29 PM
Previous versions of Gochugogi's message #16513216 « R6 vs R6II »
