GeorgeBo wrote:
Glen, I love that first one. All good but wish I was there in that first shot!
spoupard wrote:
Glen, I have to agree with the others. These are all good, but the first one really stands out. It makes me want to take a ride down that road and see where it goes.
James Markus wrote:
Glen,
The mist separating the foreground from the background adds so much depth to all three of these. As others have said - the first one really stands out. Perhaps it was a telephoto that crunches the DOF, but on a photo with such obvious depth - it creates a tension of the high background almost hanging over the viewer. I love it.
Jim
Thank you for your kind words, gentlemen. They mean a lot, coming from such distinguished company!
Here are a few more images from the air museum outside Winnipeg, taken with the Fuji X-E2 and miscellaneous MFNG (probably to be 16 f/3.5 AI fisheye).
I forget now: was that flying saucer in the first shot manufactured by humans, or captured from unidentified invaders? Do any of you military types know anything about this?
GeorgeBo wrote:
Glen, I love that first one. All good but wish I was there in that first shot!
spoupard wrote:
Glen, I have to agree with the others. These are all good, but the first one really stands out. It makes me want to take a ride down that road and see where it goes.
James Markus wrote:
Glen,
The mist separating the foreground from the background adds so much depth to all three of these. As others have said - the first one really stands out. Perhaps it was a telephoto that crunches the DOF, but on a photo with such obvious depth - it creates a tension of the high background almost hanging over the viewer. I love it.
Jim
Thank you for your kind words, gentlemen. They mean a lot, coming from such distinguished company!
Here are a few more images from the air museum outside Winnipeg, taken with the Fuji X-E2 and miscellaneous MFNG (probably to be 16 f/3.5 AI fisheye).
I forget now: was that flying saucer in the first shot manufactured by humans, or captured from unknown invaders? Do any of you military types know anything about this?
GeorgeBo wrote:
Glen, I love that first one. All good but wish I was there in that first shot!
spoupard wrote:
Glen, I have to agree with the others. These are all good, but the first one really stands out. It makes me want to take a ride down that road and see where it goes.
James Markus wrote:
Glen,
The mist separating the foreground from the background adds so much depth to all three of these. As others have said - the first one really stands out. Perhaps it was a telephoto that crunches the DOF, but on a photo with such obvious depth - it creates a tension of the high background almost hanging over the viewer. I love it.
Jim
Thank you for your kind words, gentlemen. They mean a lot, coming from such distinguished company!
Here are a few more images from the air museum outside Winnipeg, taken with the Fuji X-E2 and miscellaneous MFNG.
I forget now: was that flying saucer in the first shot manufactured, or captured? Do any of you military types know anything about this?
Do any of you military types know anything about this? 