At pag 7 there are some tests, certainly the 200-600 allows similar, but not equal photos.
In the center the 300+2x comes out a bit more defined while at the edges the difference is quite large in favor of the 300+2x, and it clearly has a nicer bokeh given not only by the fraction of a stop, but also by the "simpler" optical scheme.
Another merit of the 300gm over the zoom can be seen in this video...
At pag 7 there are some tests, certainly the 200-600 allows similar, but not equal photos.
In the center the 300+2x comes out a bit more defined while at the edges the difference is quite large in favor of the 300+2x, and it clearly has a nicer bokeh given not only by the fraction of a stop, but also by the "simpler" optical scheme.
Another merit of the 300gm over the zoom can be seen in this video...
I don't know how to incorporate the YouTube video....sry
At pag 7 there are some tests, certainly the 200-600 allows similar, but not equal photos.
In the center the 300+2x comes out a bit more defined while at the edges the difference is quite large in favor of the 300+2x, and it clearly has a nicer bokeh given not only by the fraction of a stop, but also by the "simpler" optical scheme.
Another merit of the 300gm over the zoom can be seen in this video...
https://www.y**t**e.com/watch?v=vnu-aK3Nh5Y
I don't know how to incorporate the YouTube video....sry
At pag 7 there are some tests, certainly the 200-600 allows similar, but not equal photos.
In the center the 300+2x comes out a bit more defined while at the edges the difference is quite large in favor of the 300+2x, and it clearly has a nicer bokeh given not only by the fraction of a stop, but also by the "simpler" optical scheme.
Another merit of the 300gm over the zoom can be seen in this video...
I don't know how to incorporate the YouTube video....sry
Feb 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM
Previous versions of _MacTwin_'s message #16470939 « New Sony 300mm f2.8GM with TC's »
