jwolfe wrote:
You obviously are not a bird shooter because the difference in bokeh and light transmission between f6.3 and 9 are enormous. And set that aside for a second. I bought my 200-600 and then in five minutes swapped the foot so now I can slide it right onto a mourning plate. I mean common that’s just basic stuff.
I’d rather shoot with the Nikon 600 6.3 and crop than that thing. The files are gonna be terrible in anything other than perfect light. And it’s gonna struggle with AF and tracking since Canon has thus far not offered a stacked sensor in larger mp.
I’d say Nikon had the best lenses and Sony the best bodies. Canon at this point is way way in third place with the Z8 out now. It’s just really surprising to me because for decades Canon was the leader and an innovator. They haven’t put out anything remotely class-leading in a long time for sports and wildlife. I mean look at the A9iii compared to the R3.
You appear to live in a world of infinite financial resources. Congrats?! Not all of us are limited to unhappiness by infinite resources. "I mean common that’s just basic stuff."
Nov 09, 2023 at 05:14 PM
Previous versions of Z250SA's message #16388992 « Canon 200-800? »
