BastianK wrote: j.liam wrote: BastianK wrote: j.liam wrote:
The limitations of the laws of physics remain the same. Though a lens whose mount was modified by Skyllaney or MS Optics will be better but will likely present similar limitations on the wider FL's (wider than 50mm) when adapted to digital sensors, just as occurred with Leica and Zeiss M-mount optics originally designed for film.
This is only half true.
On digital cameras with thin sensor stack (Leica M, cameras modded by Kolari) they don't perform worse than on film.
Except for the 16mm 8.0 Hologon, that is a longer story and those that care and want to read it can find it here.
Your point is well taken but Leica M aside--still incompatible with certain wide Zeiss ZM's and other acute ray angle wide optics, a costly exception to the rule.
Please tell me which "certain ZM lenses" are "incompatible" with digital cameras with a thin filterstack.
I have used more than 230 lenses of which a good portion are M-mount lenses and I call BS until then.
Zeiss ZM 21 C and 2,8/15. Have you ever tried either of them on an M-digital? I did. No bueno. (hold your declaration of Stier Scheiße )
Nov 05, 2023 at 10:20 AM
Previous versions of j.liam's message #16384054 « Contax G Best Digital Option in 2023 »
)