Re: Nikon Zf as a platform for adapted/native manual focus lenses
gear-nut wrote:
Not criticizing, just curious: what is the attraction of MF lenses when there are so many excellent AF options available at reasonable prices?
I do understand the appeal for unique and legacy lenses, just not for run of the mill optics.
For me it is the very high build quality, the special ergonomics, the incredible optics, the size and weight. This all adds up to a shooting experience that the AF lenses cannot duplicate.
I do also love my top end AF lenses for certain kinds of shooting. My GM lenses with aperture rings in particular.
AF/MF each have their purpose in my kit. It is similar to having a Porsche 911 and an SUV in the garage. Different uses, different experiences.
It also seems to me that modern designed for mirrorless lenses all seem to have similar design goals optically. I think that may be because of the testing and review styles they must pass in order to sell well. Designed for YouTube success. Manual lenses are often more orientated towards character and uniqueness.
Re: Nikon Zf as a platform for adapted/native manual focus lenses
gear-nut wrote:
Not criticizing, just curious: what is the attraction of MF lenses when there are so many excellent AF options available at reasonable prices?
I do understand the appeal for unique and legacy lenses, just not for run of the mill optics.
For me it is the very high build quality, the special ergonomics, the incredible optics, the size and weight. This all adds up to a shooting experience that the AF lenses cannot duplicate.
I do also love my top end AF lenses for certain kinds of shooting. My GM lenses with aperture rings in particular.
AF/MF each have their purpose in my kit. It is similar to having a Porsche 911 and an SUV in the garage. Different uses, different experiences.
Oct 28, 2023 at 12:59 PM
Previous versions of 1bwana1's message #16377316 « Nikon Zf as a platform for adapted/native manual focus lenses »
