RoamingScott wrote:
The 500 PF made a ton of sense on the D500. Not so much on a full frame Z by time you add an FTZ and an F mount 1.4x TC (which are seemingly worse IQ than the Z models).
If you're budget constrained it's still a great option to get to 700mm on full frame.
Today, I'll post images on FM that prove that images from the Z8/FTZ/TC14II(not III) and 500PF are tack sharp.
Edit: Here is the link from the Z8/Z9 thread about 6 weeks ago. imo, the performance is remarkable.
RoamingScott wrote:
The 500 PF made a ton of sense on the D500. Not so much on a full frame Z by time you add an FTZ and an F mount 1.4x TC (which are seemingly worse IQ than the Z models).
If you're budget constrained it's still a great option to get to 700mm on full frame.
Today, I'll post images on FM that prove that images from the Z8/FTZ/TC14II(not III) and 500PF are tack sharp.
Edit: Here is the link from the Z8/Z9 thread about 6 weeks ago
RoamingScott wrote:
The 500 PF made a ton of sense on the D500. Not so much on a full frame Z by time you add an FTZ and an F mount 1.4x TC (which are seemingly worse IQ than the Z models).
If you're budget constrained it's still a great option to get to 700mm on full frame.
Today, I'll post images on FM that prove that images from the Z8/FTZ/TC14II(not III) and 500PF are tack sharp.
