Re: Sony A6700 vs newest A7C II. How do they compare
GMPhotography wrote: jaygould wrote:
I was pretty much sold on an A7Cr, but after thinking about it some more, the a6700 may work equally good for my intents and purposes. I get better video (4k 60p oversampled), a full mechanical shutter (so better bokeh in daylight), faster flash sync speed (1/200 vs 1/160), and a full set with three lenses will cost me half as much.
The main difference is I get a stop more light on the wide angle zoom on the full frame, and more reach after cropping (up to 50mm vs only 30mm). Otherwise the small telephoto (Sigma 56 vs Sigma 90) should be better on the A6700 (f2 vs f2.8 + smaller and lighter), and the Viltrox vs Samyang are probably splitting hairs.
The best thing about the A7C (aside from the larger sensor) is the smaller and slimmer form factor and lack of protruding eyecup. But is that worth twice the cost?
I e said it a few times the 6700 is the real deal. I have the 11mm and 16-55 with it
Does anyone know of a 23 to 35mm APS-C prime lens for Sony E mount, other than the Sigma 23mm and 30mm, that is f1.8 or faster? I only know of the older 24/1.8 ZA which I used to owned want a faster prime in the mid range. Not that the Sigmas are not good, just want to understand what is out there. Thank you.
Sep 01, 2023 at 06:44 AM
Previous versions of swldstn's message #16330952 « Sony A6700 vs newest A7C II. How do they compare »
