Re: How often are you using >200mm for landscapes?
I decided to go with 100-400 instead of 70-200/f2.8 for landscape for Z. I was waiting for Nikon to make Z version of 70-300 but I gave up waiting. The lighter70-300 would have been a bit more preferable for taking the lens to hiking. I still own 70-200 VRII F lens for indoor shooting especially for shooting performance. However, for landscape. I often found 70-200 be too limited, wanting more reach for compositional reasons. I am in the NE region and still finding an over 200mm be useful, especially for regions like. Adirondack,New Hampshirite, Maine, etc. For Z lens, 70-200 and100-400 are technically the same weight and bulk, so the decision was relatively easy for me.
Luka
Luka
Aug 06, 2023 at 08:33 PM
Previous versions of akul's message #16311094 « How often are you using >200mm for landscapes? »
