Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L II adapted on R6 - image quality?
Hey all,
I recently bought a pre-owned EF 70-200 f/2.8L II for my EOS R6 with a Canon EF-RF adapter. Shooting wide open @ f/2.8, the results are less than impressive. I shot these jpg to keep it simple; no other editing has been done. As I stopped down, IQ got progressively better but still, this is not what I expected.
Are my results typical of EF "L" glass being adapted onto an RF body?
Here's the 2 jpgs of some overgrowth over my back fence at 70mm and 200mm:
Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L II adapted on R6 - image quality?
Hey all,
I recently bought a pre-owned EF 70-200 f/2.8L II for my EOS R6 with a Canon EF-RF adapter. Shooting wide open @ f/2.8, the results are less than impressive. I shot these jpg to keep it simple; no other editing has been done. As I stopped down, IQ got progressively better but still, this is not what I expected.
Are my results typical of EF "L" glass being adapted onto an RF body?
Here's the 2 jpgs of some overgrowth over my back fence:
