fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of ronno's message #16216292 « R5 - 400 MEGAPIXELS Vs Sony A1 pixel shift »

  

ronno
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: R5 - 400 MEGAPIXELS Vs Sony A1 pixel shift




osv2 wrote:
ronno wrote:
snapsy wrote:
ronno wrote:
Who here has a client who would appreciate any of this, and what is it that you are shooting for them?
How do you deliver the final image?
Asking for a friend.


Product photography
Food photography
Art reproduction
Macro photography


Hi there, you only answered part of my question.
Have you ever shot any of this stuff commercially? Why would someone want food or products shot like this? What would the final output be to warrant it?
I should commercially, and everyone I know who shoots for the biggest companies imaginable - Apple, Google, Williams-Sonoma, LVMH Louis Vuitton etc. etc. - NO ONE is shooting these techniques because there is no need. I am talking 6 and 7 figure advertising campaigns and such.


the fact that medium format exists, and is flourishing to some extent, proves that there is a market for higher resolution photos... nobody is using medium format cameras to shoot sports, bif, etc.

i think that in-camera photo stacking is a gimmick, not for real work, but there have been enough people crying for it that manufacturers have had to add the functionality... it's not always about what the pro market wants.





Seems to me, there’s a small handful of MF manufacturers, mostly using the same sensors from Sony.
From here it looks like that whole market is now using Canon, Sony and the like.
How do you suppose medium format is flourishing?

Cheers.




Apr 11, 2023 at 05:46 PM





  Previous versions of ronno's message #16216292 « R5 - 400 MEGAPIXELS Vs Sony A1 pixel shift »