Not quite sure how to interpret this off-the-cuff and far from scientific test, but...
... I just took a Lexar Professional 128GB SDXC-II 150 MP/s 1000X card out of my old XPro2 and snapped it into my XT5. I used the 15fps mechanical shutter burst mode setting. It seemed to fill the buffer in the 19 (?) frames that I expected in raw mode with no speed issues. (I write lossless compressed raw files to two cards.) Once the buffer was full it kept shooting at a slower rate as expected.
This is a card that sells for something in the $35-$40 range these days.
If we trust the 150 MP/s description, its potential speed should be slower than that of the v.60 cards, which seem to have 250+ MB/s read speeds and write speeds that are roughly half of that.
This at least _suggests_ that the thing isn't going to burst any _faster_ or _longer_ with v.90 instead of v.60 cards. I suppose it is possible that the buffer might clear faster? Maybe?
Jan 08, 2023 at 06:36 PM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #16139373 « v.60 versus v.90 for X-T5? (updated 1/18/22) »
