AmbientMike wrote: RoamingScott wrote:
I'd sell it all and buy whatever lens/body you want today. None of those items are standouts vs what's around today for the various systems.
The 5Ds/R suggestion is interesting, but would it really give you better results than any R Sony? I'd find that shocking.
You know, I do think I'd get better stuff on the 5DsR. 50mp is still one of the highest, and I think they might have a nice look. Even rebels can look good sooc. DR isn't everything. And it's not like the 5DsR doesn't have any, just not as much. But even then you can apparently get more DR blending multiple exposures.
5DsR is still a compelling landscape camera. High framerates and eye af not needed for landscapes
Agreed. The 5DsR still has maybe the highest acutance I have seen from a full frame camera.
It's true I have no experience with the latest high-res Sony or Nikon bodies, but I think there is a reason this camera is still viable today (assuming you are not using it for action). Some others agree:
AmbientMike wrote: RoamingScott wrote:
I'd sell it all and buy whatever lens/body you want today. None of those items are standouts vs what's around today for the various systems.
The 5Ds/R suggestion is interesting, but would it really give you better results than any R Sony? I'd find that shocking.
You know, I do think I'd get better stuff on the 5DsR. 50mp is still one of the highest, and I think they might have a nice look. Even rebels can look good sooc. DR isn't everything. And it's not like the 5DsR doesn't have any, just not as much. But even then you can apparently get more DR blending multiple exposures.
5DsR is still a compelling landscape camera. High framerates and eye af not needed for landscapes
Agreed. The 5DsR still has maybe the highest acutance I have experienced from a full frame camera.
It's true I have no experience with the latest high-res Sony or Nikon bodies, but I think there is a reason this camera is still viable today (assuming you are not using it for action). Some others agree:
