BastianK wrote: Irving wrote: BastianK wrote:
In my my review a lot of testing is done on Sony A7rII and there is also a bokeh comparison for thin/thick filter stack.
Long story short: I am not a huge fan of this lens on the Sony cameras.
Isn't your review for the version I of this lens not the version II?
You are mixing up Version I and II with Version II Type I and Type II because of Cosina's ridiculously stupid naming scheme.
It is also explained right at the beginning of the review in the comment you just quoted.
Version II Type I and II are the same, only the casing looks different.
Hi Bastian,
The Version II Type I and II I believe are the same optical design, but there is a difference in the weight, handling (I believe) (haptics), and appearance/presentation.
The Version II may not be to your liking or mine on a stock Sony body, but is an excellent performer on an Ultra Thin sensor modified Sony body and also on an M body. It is one of my favorite and most used lenses, but on my Kolari Vision UT sensor modified A7rII rather on my stock A1, A7rIII, or A7r. I should try it on my Kolari Vision Thin sensor V3 modified camera, but I suspect that i would have the same color issues into the corners and edges as I experienced with my Leica M 24mm f3.8 Asph and my Zeiss 35mm f1.4 Distagon ZM lenses.
Rich
Sep 14, 2022 at 12:12 PM
Previous versions of naturephoto1's message #16044230 « Voigtlander 28mm f/2 Ultron II Review »
