Previously I had a small Sony kit as a test. I've also shot the A9 with the 200-600mm
Previously I had a full Olympus kit.
Prior to the that I've shot every Nikon pro DSLR, I also had a full Canon sports kit including a 400mm 2.8, 2x 1D mkiiN's. I've shot every version of the 5D, the 1D series up to the 1DX and various small Canon bodies. I've also shot everything from a 17-40 to a 600mm f4 IS.
I've also shot the R5 with the 100-500mm as a test.
So tell me what you have and what your mirrorless experience is since you seem to know everything.
AmbientMike wrote:
Jman13 wrote:
AmbientMike wrote:
Seems to be an inverse relationship between the amount of knowledge and condescension.
Did you really just say this?
You've been in multiple threads like this, with essentially zero mirrorless experience, and certainly not Sony and RF experience, talking like a master of it all, while those of us with years of experience in BOTH systems have our opinions dismissed by you.
A little self awareness is in order.
Well, let's see. In addition to being told I don't know anything in this thread, more than once, (wasn't true either time) and being told I've never posted photos on FM, now I'm being told I've never shot mirrorless. What next? Let's see how stupid it can get from here. I'd be curious how many condescending mirrorless proponents have actually shot mirrorless more than I have.
But if you want to shoot a $1300, f/6.7, 4.1 lb 100-500 probably having no IS, all the while complaining about Canon's lack of options, weight and budget concerns even though the $600 1.4 lb 100-400 is available, while telling me I know nothing go ahead, I guess. Makes no sense.
And yet, you still say this stuff that makes no sense. Then since you can't attack the points I actually made you have to attack on the gear I bought.
Sep 09, 2022 at 11:56 AM
Previous versions of AmbientMike's message #16040248 « Is Viltrox Getting Sued? (No more RF-EF Adapters/Speedboosters/Lenses) »
